[ 本帖最後由 hongkong 於 2008-4-19 23:23 編輯 ] 原帖由 <i>馬高</i> 於 2008-4-19 23:14 發表<br />
好的,俾個咪你慢慢講 <br />
我同某人相似,打字快過講野......。 Firstly, i do appreciate discussion based on fair tones but not tones with offense.
Secondly, all models are designed for analysis. The conclusion varies from people. You can disagree my conclusion with your OWN developed point of view, again, but not a sense of offense.
If you cannot offer any your RATIONAL point of view, i cant see any value for the discussion 原帖由 <i>馬高</i> 於 2008-4-19 23:24 發表<br /><br />
Firstly, i do appreciate discussion based on fair tones but not tones with offense.<br /><br />
Secondly, all models are designed for analysis. The conclusion varies from people. You can disagree my conclus ... <br /><br />
<br />
How can you judge my opinion representing "Offense" and "not Rational"?
[ 本帖最後由 hongkong 於 2008-4-19 23:50 編輯 ] ok. that's the end of discussion
OWN developed point?
呢條友寫得幾好睇,啱既要學,錯既唔好學.<br /><br />
Five Forces Analysis helps the marketer to contrast a competitive environment. It has similarities with other tools for environmental audit, such as PEST analysis, but tends to focus on the single, stand alone, business or SBU (Strategic Business Unit) <font color="Red"><b>rather than a single product or range of products. </b></font>For example, Dell would analyse the market for Business Computers i.e. one of its SBUs.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.marketingteacher.com/Lessons/lesson_fivefoces.htm" target="_blank">http://www.marketingteacher.com/Lessons/lesson_fivefoces.htm</a>
OWN developed point (2)?
啱既野不妨一看再看:-Michael Porter's famous Five Forces of Competitive Position model provides a simple perspective for assessing and analysing the competitive strength and position of a corporation or business organization.
http://www.businessballs.com/portersfiveforcesofcompetition.htm
明未?
上星期節目:唔係咁用(用5 forces去評eeePC),咁點用?你教我嘞……美国高端PC市场Mac市占高达66%
http://www.macx.cn/a/a4000i601853.htm經"高手"用自創既5 forces"不用多講"法分析出eeePC所攻既"馬屐"唔健康,再推論,原來唔健康既係"批西馬屐",而唔係Computer Market. 原帖由 hongkong 於 2008-4-19 23:03 發表 http://www.forum.talkonly.net/images/common/back.gif
嘩,封你做“高手”,睇完都唔知Analyse咗Asus乜野出來(大部份都不用多講),咁既culture,卒之明白#5號...............
亂套理論,Reference書比佢睇完當堂變“Book Guide",所以#5號仔輸到仆直。
繼續建議維持看淡5號仔股價.:
〔利益申報: 本人在過去一星期及未來兩星期(睇完回應後)均不會對5號仔有任何買賣〕...
昨日5號仔公佈業績,與我預期所言,仍因次按問題而勁撇帳,有與我為伍齊齊睇淡佢既人呢期真係輸少當贏囉。:victory: